9/11 I'm not sure what to think?

[Dirtworks Films]

I know it's old news, but I'm really confused on the truth. What are your thoughts?

YouTube - 9/11: Why the World is Demanding a Criminal Investigation (http://youtube.com/watch?v=mzmKzr4ZN2Y&feature=related)

[4trax]

Not my thoughts, but very informative.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rCFWcKVeWUE&feature=PlayList&p=668220775B3DBF45&index=1

[Dirtworks Films]

YouTube - 9/11 Coincidences (Part One) (http://youtube.com/watch?v=Odp1FO0Vmuw&feature=related)

YouTube - 9/11: Total Proof That Bombs Were Planted In The Buildings! (http://youtube.com/watch?v=8n-nT-luFIw&feature=related)

YouTube - 9/11 Coincidences (Part Two) (http://youtube.com/watch?v=i7BSt9jhxPQ&feature=related)

YouTube - 9/11 Coincidences (Part Three) (http://youtube.com/watch?v=Pd8B-8Au-Wk&feature=related)

YouTube - 9/11: Mystery Plane (CNN) (http://youtube.com/watch?v=h8mGvFzvwFM&feature=related)

[HotRod82]

What is funny to me is how all of these 9/11 conspiracy loons think Bush is so stupid, completely inept, the worst president ever. Yet they are willing to give him credit for what would be the greatest con job ever. It would take a crew of 80 to 100 men working full time for a month to rig a building that size for a controlled demo. The government cant keep anything secret, there is no way to pull that off. Then of course they would have to coordinate all this with bin laden and his people, I wonder if all these nut jobs think the first wtc bombing, our embassy in africa and the uss cole were also rigged by that genious GWB?? I think the guy has a hard time tying his shoes, let alone actually planning anything.

[TreyP]

Don't believe the nut jobs that post this utter crud. If I wasn't heading to Mex in the morning I would have fun debunking these idiots. Maybe when I get back I can play.

[MiSsKuSKiE]

We live in a corrupt world, enough said!

[Demp]

good find bob,

those videos are crazy... just made me take a second and think:confused:

[Vtr_Racing]

In the first video, valid questions. Its not unlikely to also have a theory. Since the terrorist were able to execute the coordinated attack with aircraft, why not add some explosives to a nearby building.
Honestly, I'm completely ignorant on the WTC7 building conspiracy theory. Just a thought.

[dan200]

Don't believe the nut jobs that post this utter crud. If I wasn't heading to Mex in the morning I would have fun debunking these idiots. Maybe when I get back I can play.

In treys absence

http://www.snopes.com/rumors/fema.asp

[200MPHTape]

Not one of those nut cakes are ENGINEERS, have no clue to how a building is built and what holds them up. I'm sure there are no seismic instruments in NY, but I'm sure it rattled the whole city, the tower seven video you can see it shake then the center core collapsed and once you loose the core, nothing can hold up that much! They even say it just crumbled, stupid jerks!!!!!! Just to help some of you understand, the center core were the elevators are pretty much holds the whole building up, you loose the core it will collapse in on it self. The case of the 2 main towers, the floors were the planes struck gave way with how many floors above? Gravity always wins.

[scottm]

I hate that crap. Just like the idiots claiming we never landed on the moon, or OJ didn't do it, or my favorite - that the earth and universe is no more than 6000 years old. Some jackass named Ken Hamm now has a 'science museum' that claims dinosars and humans lived at the same time! You can selectively look at small bits of info on any subject, out of context, and present it in a way that 'satisfies' people who are too willing or predisposed to believe it. Or you can look at things honestly through physics, math, geology, astronomy, and even logical thought, and find complete correlation with the conventional conclusion: Al kiada crashed planes, astronauts landed on the moon, oj did it, and the universe is very old. I think most people who are taking the time to put out the crap are just doing it for the demogogic thrill of seeing how many people they can fool.

[scottm]

I cant beleive I just wasted 20 minutes watching that ****. The only way to ensure a building that big comes down with controlled explosions is to spend weeks prepping it by cutting into key beams and structures with torches, in addition to extensive rigging with explosives. The explosives would result in a bundle of cables probably 6 feet in diameter running out the buildings and down the street. Someone said it would take 100 guys a month to rig those buildings for a conventional implosion. Thats probably a conservative estimate. Those buildings were 1/4 mile square at the base - go out and pace that off then tell me a carbomb or some unnoticable halfass rigging could bring it down. Now I have no problem believing there could be secondary explosions. Maybe al kiada did plant van bombs inside, or maybe natural gas leaks were happening. But the ultimate proof that the buildings were not brought down by controlled implosion is the fact that the collapse starts at the top, not the bottom. Somple fact - No controlled building collapses are started at the top.

[pappawheely]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9SJifBEkRgQ