Advertisement
Results 1 to 1 of 1

Thread: Supreme Court Decision on Fairy Shrimp & the ESA

  1. #1
    Junior
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Southern California
    Miles
    111

    Supreme Court Decision on Fairy Shrimp & the ESA

    * LOCAL: Supreme Court refuses to enter debate over endangered species
    WASHINGTON (January 14 2002, 11: 05 a.m. PST) - The Supreme Court has turned down a chance to set limits on how far the government can go to protect endangered species.
    <http://cgi.fresnobee.com/go.cgi?/local/story/1464309p-1540761c.html>



    fresnoBee.com
    Supreme Court refuses to enter debate over
    endangered species

    By GINA HOLLAND
    Associated Press

    WASHINGTON (AP) - The Supreme Court has turned down a chance to set
    limits on how far the government can go to protect endangered species.

    The case the court refused Monday to review involves shrimp found mainly in
    California, but it would have affected government efforts to protect all dying
    wildlife.

    An association of Californians builders challenged the constitutionality of the
    Endangered Species Act and the way the government handled the classification of
    shrimp.

    Over the years a string of lawsuits have been filed over classifications of various
    species, from red wolves and bald eagles to arroyo toads and Delhi Sand
    flower-loving flies. In this case, builders were asking the Supreme Court to roll
    back protection given shrimp.

    The builders attorneys told the court that Californians "run the risk of violating
    federal law by simply walking on their land. Placing a foot in a puddle of water can
    result in heavy fines or even imprisonment if it harms the small and delicate fairy
    shrimp."

    They questioned the need for protection for the shrimp, which are not sold
    commercially.

    Theodore Olson, the Bush administration's Supreme Court lawyer, did not take part
    in the case. In the past he has opposed government regulation in similar cases.

    Paul D. Clement, acting solicitor general, defended the shrimp classification.

    "Individual species are part of an interdependent web," Clement wrote. "The
    significance of a particular species cannot always be easily determined at a given
    point in time."

    The case involves three species classified as endangered - Conservancy fairy
    shrimp, longhorn fairy shrimp, and vernal pool tadpole shrimp. The shrimp are found
    in California's central valley and in Oregon.

    The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit sided with the U.S.
    Fish and Wildlife Service. The court agreed with the builders that the service should
    have circulated a study on the shrimp.

    The case is Building Industry Association of Superior California v. Norton, 01-620.
    © 2001 , The Fresno Bee


    Randy
    CORVA Field Rep - So. Cal.
    AMA, BRC, SDORC

  2. # ADS
    Circuit advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Miles
    Many

    Membership in the largest desert racing community has its advantages

    - Participate in Forum Discussions
    - Send and Receive Private Messages
    - Maintain Public Photo Albums
    - Access to Groups
    - User Profile in our Social Network
    - Increased Access to more Sub Forums
    - Reduced Online Advertisements

    Join our community today

     

Similar Threads

  1. Gun Grabbers and the Supreme Court
    By scott-dsms in forum Whatever - General Discussion
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: March 25th, 2008, 15:32
  2. Supreme Court Strips Al Gore's Oscar From Him
    By Dave_G in forum Whatever - General Discussion
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: March 3rd, 2007, 00:55

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •