-
September 21st, 2007, 07:43
#11
Re: aluminum vs. steel
When you factor in the endurance limit, Al doesn't always come out lighter.
-
September 21st, 2007 07:43
# ADS
Circuit advertisement
|
|
Membership in the largest desert racing community has its advantages
- Participate in Forum Discussions
- Send and Receive Private Messages
- Maintain Public Photo Albums
- Access to Groups
- User Profile in our Social Network
- Increased Access to more Sub Forums
- Reduced Online Advertisements
Join our community today |
-
September 23rd, 2007, 09:12
#12
Forum Junkie
Re: aluminum vs. steel

Originally Posted by
therail
...non ferrous means it does not contain iron as an alloying element...
Correct. FWIW, whether magnetic or not, stainless steels are not even close to being non-ferrous. This includes those from Egypt.
Support Our Troops ------ If you can't stand behind them, feel free to walk in front of them.
If your looking for something blingy and complex, I'm delighted to disappoint you!
"[Nye Frank] built the best, and never looked to anyone for recognition, the mark of a true man, one of the last true cowboys of our sport!"
"The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance -- it is the illusion of knowledge"
If you are racing a fair race...your strategy sucks!
-
September 24th, 2007, 15:13
#13
Elite
Re: aluminum vs. steel

Originally Posted by
FABRICATOR
Correct. FWIW, whether magnetic or not, stainless steels are not even close to being non-ferrous. This includes those from Egypt.

I was actually just wondering about this the other day. Thanks.

Originally Posted by
dan200
Obama is bad for America.
-
October 4th, 2007, 13:58
#14
Familia
Re: aluminum vs. steel
Here is some uneducated input but I am curious to what the answer is. What about an Aluminum monococh (sp?) chasis. Military and civilian aircraft (massive weight) land on aluminum monococh arms. I know this design has been used successfully in the mountain bike industry as well. Could be way off and not sure how the application would work in our cars but.... Maybe the wisdom of others here can make something out of this.
-
October 4th, 2007, 17:38
#15
Powered by Optima
Re: aluminum vs. steel
Aluminum is actually used on some golf cart frames... but they break all the time
. I know of a certian plane that wasn't engineered correctly and the wings would break off and it would turn into a giant popsickle stick... and they dont fly so well. Aluminum is kind of funny, if you ever get near it's strength potential it becomes weakened and that potential is reduced. Steel does not act this way... it wont fatigue unless you surpass it's strength potential, and that will break any material.
-
October 4th, 2007, 21:04
#16
Loyal
Re: aluminum vs. steel
what do you guys think of this? Try not to think of the price involved if one were to use this...
http://www.crptechnology.com/sito/im...alloy_2007.pdf
-
October 5th, 2007, 07:09
#17
Powered by Optima
Re: aluminum vs. steel
Is this Aluminum weldable? It dosen't say. The main cage would still have to be a ferrious material for safety reasons.
-
October 5th, 2007, 07:32
#18
Re: aluminum vs. steel

Originally Posted by
la2baja
Here is some uneducated input but I am curious to what the answer is. What about an Aluminum monococh (sp?) chasis. Military and civilian aircraft (massive weight) land on aluminum monococh arms. I know this design has been used successfully in the mountain bike industry as well. Could be way off and not sure how the application would work in our cars but.... Maybe the wisdom of others here can make something out of this.
I'm not sure how it would work?? It would be interesting to try a monocoque type of construction. But I think if it was made of aluminum it would losen or pound out at the rivit joints. Your better bet would be to construct it of all composit but then the cost would be threw the roof. In either case as Philofab said you would still need to attach the main cage that was made of some kind of ferrous metal.
Dump
-
October 5th, 2007, 08:43
#19
Loyal
Re: aluminum vs. steel
yes, it is weldable. I saw it in an issue of RACECAR ENGINEERING being used on some type of road car for the main chassis in Japan. Obviously, road vs. off road is a story in itself, but it would be interesting to see if the main chassis (minus the roll cage) would have any use for the material. Also, beyond the bring your own tig welder to the dezert problems issue.
-
October 6th, 2007, 07:04
#20
Forum Junkie
Re: aluminum vs. steel

Originally Posted by
la2baja
Here is some uneducated input but I am curious to what the answer is. What about an Aluminum monococh (sp?) chasis. Military and civilian aircraft (massive weight) land on aluminum monococh arms. I know this design has been used successfully in the mountain bike industry as well. Could be way off and not sure how the application would work in our cars but.... Maybe the wisdom of others here can make something out of this.
It could certainly work. The question is: could it work better and is it worth it? Current steel chassis are safe, durable, repairable, fairly easy and inexpensive to construct, and have good strength to weight ratios. There are many practical and basic things besides the chassis that can be refined with good results.
Support Our Troops ------ If you can't stand behind them, feel free to walk in front of them.
If your looking for something blingy and complex, I'm delighted to disappoint you!
"[Nye Frank] built the best, and never looked to anyone for recognition, the mark of a true man, one of the last true cowboys of our sport!"
"The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance -- it is the illusion of knowledge"
If you are racing a fair race...your strategy sucks!