Page 1 of 2 1 2 Last
Results 1 to 10 of 20

Thread: Cantilever variation.

  1. #1
    Fresh Blood
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Bloomington, MN
    Miles
    82

    Cantilever variation.

    I need the area aft of my rear axle for a sub tank on my 80 series land cruiser. I am more than willing to massage the shape of the fenders and even tub the rear fenders a bit but I want to keep the shocks out of the interior. The only place I could have a shock hoop inside anyway would require attaching the bottom of the shock to the axle or close to it reducing travel with a given shock length.

    It is not to scale for sure but just the basic concept.

    It would allow for a traditional type of lower link and for the mounting of shocks a bit farther forward than a "helmet" link or some of the other cantilever systems I have seen. I also think the two links for the bottom of the shock are a simpler way than a rocker arm.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	SUSPENSION.jpg 
Views:	403 
Size:	34.5 KB 
ID:	63983  

  2. # ADS
    Circuit advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Miles
    Many

    Membership in the largest desert racing community has its advantages

    - Participate in Forum Discussions
    - Send and Receive Private Messages
    - Maintain Public Photo Albums
    - Access to Groups
    - User Profile in our Social Network
    - Increased Access to more Sub Forums
    - Reduced Online Advertisements

    Join our community today

     

  3. #2
    Forum Junkie partybarge_pilot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Leucadia, CA.
    Miles
    5,174

    Re: Cantilever variation.

    The main problem with that is your motion ratio is going the wrong direction. AT full bump your shock would be doing almost nothing. You would be way better off with a bell crank set-up.

  4. #3
    Prospect
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    New Zealand
    Miles
    15

    Re: Cantilever variation.

    It will work but with that design you will find that the shock performance curve is ramping down...
    Right at the start of the wheel travel (from bottomed out) the shock will compress at the fastest rate, and the further up the wheel comes the slower the shock compression... just looking at it I'd say the last 4" or so of wheel travel would have next to no shock response

    The ride would be harsh on small bumps and it would bottom out aggresivly on large landings

    If all you are worried about is locating the shock under the floor of the truck... run fixed pivot pionts off the chassi and a cantilever arm this will make your shock perform the same as dirrectly attacted to the swing arm

    Cheers Reece

  5. #4
    Fresh Blood
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Bloomington, MN
    Miles
    82

    Re: Cantilever variation.

    I look at it now and can see that the where the two links meet would be moving less than the link mounting point to the lower arm...

    This was a quick edit... Closer?
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	SUSPENSION2.jpg 
Views:	299 
Size:	34.6 KB 
ID:	63984  

  6. #5
    Elite Scott_F's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Anaheim
    Miles
    879

    Re: Cantilever variation.

    Your last idea may be worse, if that is possible. You need to understand the concepts of motion ratio, rising rate and falling rate.

  7. #6
    Prospect
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    New Zealand
    Miles
    15

    Re: Cantilever variation.

    you havn't changed the design... the motion on the shock will be exactly the same

    I was going to draw a pic to show you the motion and how it effects the shock but I've got a couple of clients in the shop so I'll make this quick

    hold your hands out infront of you, so you can look at the sides of your hands, fingertips piont to piont, this is where the shock attatches one palm is the chassi the other the swing arm, now keeping your fingers straight move the shock mount a bit... with your fingers near flat notice how your palms dont get closer but you have alot of movement at your tips, so if that was on your truck the shock & spring would be working ALOT for very little wheel travel
    Now peak your fingers this is simulating full travel notice how your palms can move in and out easily with no in and out motion at your finger tips.... so you suspension on the last of its travel would be increadably soft bottoming out very harshly

    Hope this helped lol

    Cheers Reece

  8. #7
    Accepted
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Hemet, CA
    Miles
    218

    Re: Cantilever variation.

    Have you thought about what chaplain did on his 4runner? you wouldn't have room for a coilover but you wouldn't have to mess with all the complications of a cantilever system.
    http://www.ttora.com/forum/showthread.php?t=88480

  9. #8
    Fresh Blood
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Bloomington, MN
    Miles
    82

    Re: Cantilever variation.

    Not enough travel.. 12" of travel can be done on the 80 by modifying the existing shock mounts.. 10" is pretty easy to do.. But in either case you need to lower the bump stops to prevent bottoming the shock out. It works out ok for crawling articulation but reduces whooptybility.

    As you can see form that shot that a large shock could fit if it was closer to paralleling the frame rail. I kind of like the challenge and think it is all worth it if I can get a bunch of travel out of it.

    This is all just the basic concept. Once I have a direction I will use a CAD program and crunch some numbers.. Does this look more like it?
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	SUSPENSION3.jpg 
Views:	199 
Size:	33.6 KB 
ID:	63995  

  10. #9
    Prospect
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    New Zealand
    Miles
    15

    Re: Cantilever variation.

    Can you make that any smaller lol getting better but you need to make your cantilever arm "L" shaped so you shock mounting arm will compress the shock .... at the moment its not really compressing the shock....

    Cheers Reece

  11. #10
    Mini Metal MOD DSRacing's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    San Diego
    Miles
    3,349

    Re: Cantilever variation.

    MNGSX,

    Your heading in the right direction with your last design. I would put a little more thought into the design of the bellcrank. I posted some photos of other cantilever designs people have built in the past. Granted most of these are mounted on leaf spring vehicles but the concept is the same. The last photo is the old Baldwin TT. Here's a link to a thread not too long ago which has some good info.

    http://www.race-dezert.com/forum/sho...ver+suspension







    Caution! Tony T. said I could be dangerous.
    One man's fun is another's hell.

Similar Threads

  1. Another Cantilever suspension question
    By starvenmarvin in forum Shop - Suspension & Steering
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: November 28th, 2008, 11:28
  2. cantilever rear suspension
    By Dustymiles89 in forum Shop - Suspension & Steering
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: October 8th, 2008, 15:38
  3. Cantilever
    By Supertoys-Adventures in forum Shop - Suspension & Steering
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: July 26th, 2007, 13:19
  4. Cantilever JJ Rack
    By Junior in forum Shop - Miscellaneous
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: May 17th, 2004, 10:09
  5. 3-link Cantilever
    By Josh_Bethmann in forum Shop - Miscellaneous
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: February 24th, 2004, 12:00

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •