AD INDEX - Listing of all advertisers
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 Last
Results 1 to 10 of 18

Thread: acceptable camber change....

  1. #1
    Accepted UndercoverFab is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    the wrong side of the country
    Miles
    233
    Rep Level
    10
    Rep Power
    9

    acceptable camber change....

    i`m wondering what everyones opinion on acceptable camber change from positive at full droop to negative at full bump, thanks in advance.

  2. Supporter of the Site

    Membership in the largest desert racing community has its advantages

    - Participate in Forum Discussions
    - Send and Receive Private Messages
    - Maintain Public Photo Albums
    - Access to Groups
    - User Profile in our Social Network
    - Increased Access to more Sub Forums
    - Reduced Online Advertisements

    Join our community today


  3. #2
    Forum Junkie ntsqd is a jewel in the rough
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Here
    Miles
    2,428
    Rep Level
    98
    Rep Power
    15

    Re: acceptable camber change....

    Ideally you want the tire to stay flat to the surface it is rolling on. So optimum camber change will depend on your roll center and the roll angularity limit of the design. Then what ever camber you pre-set to offset tire carcass squirm will remain constant thru the range of motion. If you are running a light tire or a heavy vehicle you may want a little camber gain from the above ideal to help with excessive carcass squirm.

  4. #3
    Loyal BA_DirtDriver is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Southern Cal
    Miles
    157
    Rep Level
    10
    Rep Power
    10

    Re: acceptable camber change....

    positive camber is not good. You should be gaining negative camber up to full bump. The appropriate amount depends on the anticipated body roll per steering/ turning input. As most off road trucks/vehicles run low spirng rates at the wheel the anticipated body roll might be quite high. This would generally require more neg camber gain. Most designs that I have seen let the vehicles take 5-7 degrees of "set" with considerably less neg camber gain. This stems from much more important striaght line bump characteristics than then turning performance. Watch any off road video most of the vehicles roll pretty far on asphault turns. This attached pics shows not nearly enough negative camber gain, but the truck wins so obviously there has been some compromise.

    FWIW

    Bret
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version Name:	83025-5-42806-Visola.jpg‎ Views:	471 Size:	48.6 KB ID:	3612  

  5. #4
    Accepted UndercoverFab is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    the wrong side of the country
    Miles
    233
    Rep Level
    10
    Rep Power
    9

    Re: acceptable camber change....

    almost every truck i`ve seen with beams has some amount of positive camber at full droop, i`m building a set for a fullsize chevy now and the minimum amount of positive camber i have gotten so far is 2 1/2 degrees at full droop while having 3 1/2 at full bump, i still live on the east coast and i cant just run to a local shop to shoot the breeze about suspension design.

  6. #5
    Elite Brian Mapes is just really nice Brian Mapes is just really nice Brian Mapes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Corona, Ca.
    Miles
    812
    Rep Level
    111
    Rep Power
    12

    Re: acceptable camber change....

    With beams there is going to be positive camber while drooping but with arms you dont want to have positive camber at all. Positive is =\ / Negative is = / \ It is always going to be different with every truck because there are so many variables. I wouldnt have any more than six at full bump and about 4 at full droop.

  7. #6
    Accepted UndercoverFab is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    the wrong side of the country
    Miles
    233
    Rep Level
    10
    Rep Power
    9

    Re: acceptable camber change....

    my main concern is what the front ends gonna do when it comes down off a jump or skipping along a whoop section with an excessive amount of positive camber when its at or close to full droop, with the arms i have planned now i`d only be at 2 1/2 maxed out and i have no problem with 22 inchs of usable travel, thanks for the help guys, it`d be alot easier if their was a desert on the east coast

  8. #7
    Elite Brian Mapes is just really nice Brian Mapes is just really nice Brian Mapes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Corona, Ca.
    Miles
    812
    Rep Level
    111
    Rep Power
    12

    Re: acceptable camber change....

    Wait so you are building a chevy right? With a arms or I beams? With a arms you want no positive camber at all. I think that if you had positive camber on a armed truck that it would try to cause excess body roll. As well as putting more stress on your suspension and steering components.

  9. #8
    Accepted UndercoverFab is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    the wrong side of the country
    Miles
    233
    Rep Level
    10
    Rep Power
    9

    Re: acceptable camber change....

    yeah you got it right, chevy with beams. i thought i mentioned that in the first post but i guess i forgot, my bad.

  10. #9
    Elite Brian Mapes is just really nice Brian Mapes is just really nice Brian Mapes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Corona, Ca.
    Miles
    812
    Rep Level
    111
    Rep Power
    12

    Re: acceptable camber change....

    Well since it is beams then you are going to have a pretty good deal of camber change. Are they equal length beams or not. If you are only gong to be getting 2 1/2 degrees of positive camber at full droop then I would say that is pretty good as most i beam trucks are getting much more than that. But if you are going to be getting that minimal amount of camber at full droop then what are you getting at full bump because it seems like you will get enourmous negative camber. Search for "any one have more pics of this truck?" and there is some pics of a class 8 with some crazy beams take a look at them. Solo motorsports is also doing a chevy with beams. Solo You cant see any beam pics but you can see the rest of the truck.

  11. #10
    Accepted UndercoverFab is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    the wrong side of the country
    Miles
    233
    Rep Level
    10
    Rep Power
    9

    Re: acceptable camber change....

    the ones i drew up with 2 1/2 positive at full droop had 5 degrees negative at full bump, the ones with 3 1/2 negative at full bump had 4 positive at full droop, i`m pretty set on the first design right now except for that fact that i have more up travel from ride height then i do down travel, i don`t know which would be better more up travel or more down travel, basically living on the east coast i`m shootin from the hip at what i think will work good, theres only so much i test out on mx tracks and fire roads out here.

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Normal change in camber for a long travel I-beam suspension???
    By atomicjoe23 in forum Shop - Suspension & Steering
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: December 8th, 2009, 16:24
  2. Baja 1K acceptable lines.
    By Elk Hunter in forum Desert Racing
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: October 23rd, 2009, 13:59
  3. Replies: 17
    Last Post: June 2nd, 2009, 00:30
  4. Camber Change when backing up
    By zipperhead in forum Shop - Suspension & Steering
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: January 15th, 2007, 17:48
  5. camber change buggy rear IRS
    By 5racer in forum Shop - Suspension & Steering
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: May 25th, 2006, 17:51

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts