jon coleman
in n out.double double w cheese
didnt you go??, they talked about how the course was tuff& was gonna eat a lot of enginesThere was a drivers meeting?

Attachments
Last edited:
didnt you go??, they talked about how the course was tuff& was gonna eat a lot of enginesThere was a drivers meeting?
He actually said something like this after driving Lukes,I would be willing to bet that even Rob himself would tell you that he would not have a chance against the AWD trucks if they held up to the finish line.
"90% of the game [ baseball ] is played above-the-shoulders"I think the man may have learned to protect his machinery from Rod Hall & Ivan Stewart.......
The hare & the tortoise!!
Not that any of them are slow...lol
"90% of the game [ baseball ] is played above-the-shoulders"
-- Yogi Berra
"Motorsports is a THINKING MAN'S GAME"
-- Wally Dallenbach
"It is better to OUT THINK your opponent, rather than to OUT FIGHT him"
-- Sun Tzu "Art of War"
RobMac played a conservative strategy,i.e. he ran a SMART RACE
"We'll conserve the truck, by 700 mile mark, if we have to race, we have something left"
-- Mikey Childress, TT #7 (Fabtech TT, owned by Scott Steinberger), 2007 Baja 1000 interview @COntingency
^^^ THIS. Smart race strategy..
Below seen at Rock N Road cyclery (SPeciaized dealer) near Rancho Santa Margarita/CA
View attachment 245965
The fact that you put a Mikey Childress interview from the 07 B1000 in this is hilarious. The Class 1 I co-drove in to San Ignacio blew its engine at San Juanico. I was sitting at the highway intersection near La Purisima waiting for darkness before driving backwards into San Juanico to rescue them. There was a chase crew there so we started talking. He told me Mike was on his way. It was evening of the second day...way off the pace, but Mikey was driving like he was going to win the race! That truck looked like hammered dog poop when it rolled in. There was no hood, and every body panel was damaged! While they swapped co-drivers and splashed some fuel, I talked to Mike for a few minutes. We knew each other from bike racing days. After he left, the co-driver that got out told me that he had never had a ride like that! I remembered us passing them during the night, turns out they had a bad alternator and were waiting on parts.
I have one sister, Sarah Nardini, who is 6 years older than I am. It was kind of tough having my older sister stick up for me whenever I had a problem with another kid, when most kids would have had an older brother to do that job. Sarah did an excellent job at it though and she still does. She lives in Salem, Oregon (with her husband, Michael and the two girls, Brittany and Katie), but is looking forward to moving back home to Wrightwood in the near future. Love you Sarah !
When I was 9 years old, we moved to Clyde Ranch, in the Lone Pine Canyon area of Wrightwood. Clyde Ranch is a 160 acre working apple ranch which was established in 1870. There are no utilities, except phone, in that canyon still today. We had a generator that we used very seldom and I did my homework by kerosene lamp, literally living similar to that of a pioneer. We couldn't get any TV reception there, so the alternative activities were reading, playing board games and things like that. I learned alot about apple trees during the two years we lived there and I split alot of wood since that was our only source of heat. It was a learning experience in many ways. It was okay, but I was glad to move back into the residential area.
I agree.I guess it depends on what by definition is considered “complexity”.
If the advancement in technology by itself in one’s opinion is making things complex, well that is a debatable subject.
Over engineering too the point of complexity is a whole other kettle of fish.
lets get back to basics, a 26 mile foot raceI guess it depends on what by definition is considered “complexity”.
If the advancement in technology by itself in one’s opinion is making things complex, well that is a debatable subject.
Over engineering too the point of complexity is a whole other kettle of fish.
My entire existence is based on this methodology. Less is more. Also, the complacent get what other complacents get. So it's easy to run the road less traveled even if you're just going slow. Slower is faster. Doing something is better than doing nothing. Doing nothing is nothing but doing something is learning and progressing in time. Time being the true cost of everything. Some people mistakenly understand "time is money" to mean that my time should be worth a set amount of money when in reality losing time is losing the VALUE OF LIFE. Not monetary. You don't get back the time of your life in which you waste. Little goals add up to a large achievement. Keep setting small achievable goals. Not large out of this world goals that you can't and won't achieve.I posted my Antifragility theory on monday and since have been reading more about it. Its fascinating to me.
For lazy mode simply yt search it and when Nassim Nicholas Taleb comes up watch.
Basically the key is to take many smaller risks and stresses over time. Each experience and especially failure is a lesson that you build upon. You never ever just do 100%. You do 110% in many things over long periods of time. Always doing tiny bit more into the uncomfortable zone. That way your risks are diversified and so are your strengths. Now if the outliner event occurs you are not relying on just that one strength in your capital. Its near impossible to get whipped out in a disaster. Contrary you will shine the more stress there is because stress is your language. You actually love it.
Decentralized structures hence increase in value moderately in normal times and positively explode under stress. I see the world of off-road that way and oppose a single sanctioning body over many organizations how it currently functions. Its to make the whole not only resilient but antifragile. Offroad is just so much more complicated compared to other sports that the marketers looking for fast return with minimum investment run after failures. It keep offroad racing pure of parasite types as they get easier targets in other motorsports. The easy ones.
This approach applies to many if not all things in life.
yes.My entire existence is based on this methodology. Less is more. Also, the complacent get what other complacents get. So it's easy to run the road less traveled even if you're just going slow. Slower is faster. Doing something is better than doing nothing. Doing nothing is nothing but doing something is learning and progressing in time. Time being the true cost of everything. Some people mistakenly understand "time is money" to mean that my time should be worth a set amount of money when in reality losing time is losing the VALUE OF LIFE. Not monetary. You don't get back the time of your life in which you waste. Little goals add up to a large achievement. Keep setting small achievable goals. Not large out of this world goals that you can't and won't achieve.
If sand were money, the beaches would be bare so the idea is to make a value of yourself and it doesn't matter the value of the currency; Be a renaissance man.
i had fun at All my races, especially the first few rx 7 road races getting lapped & not getting in the way, even later on , hanging with the lead pack was my goal, made it in the later years, never had a bad race, even my couple of dnfs, clutch& twice fuel, learned a lotyes.
Now the one that has his value tight to money that is getting debased by others out of his own control... ohh boy. That must suck.
Back to racing.... The one that races a lot and enjoys every failure and gets value out of it. The one that fails a lot but small over long time will win big when the challenges are plenty. Thats why some do well at longer stressful races vs. others do well at sprints. Its the driver and team. People. You see it in the same people winning the long races over and over no matter what they drive. vs. Those that bet all on one or two game changer technologies.
yes.
Now the one that has his value tight to money that is getting debased by others out of his own control... ohh boy. That must suck.
Back to racing.... The one that races a lot and enjoys every failure and gets value out of it. The one that fails a lot but small over long time will win big when the challenges are plenty. Thats why some do well at longer stressful races vs. others do well at sprints. Its the driver and team. People. You see it in the same people winning the long races over and over no matter what they drive. vs. Those that bet all on one or two game changer technologies.
^^^ THIS.."As I've said before, Honda needs to race. Racing is such a key part of our culture; it is not about the simple marketing benefits of racing. Honda needs to race to support its interests in associate and technology development and motivation of our associates, dealers, suppliers and customers."