New Generation Jimco class 1

Jorge Rodriguez

50% tortoise 50% hare
Posts
3,672
Reaction
623
Not sure if you've all seen this already but this definitely looks different than what's out today in class 1. Nice to see something different and can't wait to see how well it works. Share your thoughts and knowledge.
ImageUploadedByrace-deZert1475246692.980029.jpg



Sent from the RDC Mobile App. Get it for your IOS device today
 

McCredie A

Well-Known Member
Posts
736
Reaction
319
It looks like RZR rear suspension. I believe some of the sand car builders have used this method. 5 link?
 

doug969

Well-Known Member
Posts
1,245
Reaction
86
This car also has the TT front end and steering box. Much different than the 2000 series and the Champion cars they build.
 

Porboy

Well-Known Member
Posts
349
Reaction
85
Armada has built a few 10 cars with similar rear suspension.
img_6236.jpg
 

Fourstroker

Well-Known Member
Posts
5,047
Reaction
1,253
Underseat fuel cell I am guessing
 

Dezertpilot

Well-Known Member
Posts
5,687
Reaction
476
Oh man that is bitchen!
 

DanMcMillin

Crane Motorsports
Posts
2,560
Reaction
6,064
Reminds me of Dale Ebberts' class one car from years ago. Different for sure, curious to see how it does. I think the mid engine will be interesting but I know of another team (maybe 2) making theirs rear engine.
 

Jorge Rodriguez

50% tortoise 50% hare
Posts
3,672
Reaction
623
Reminds me of Dale Ebberts' class one car from years ago. Different for sure, curious to see how it does. I think the mid engine will be interesting but I know of another team (maybe 2) making theirs rear engine.

Have you driven a mid engine 1 car?
If so, what are the differences?


Sent from the RDC Mobile App. Get it for your IOS device today
 

bajaxp

Baja Bobsled Team
Posts
4,445
Reaction
1,859
I would think the longer arm geometry would change the squat/anti-squat quite a bit versus a traditional class 1 short arm rear suspension. It will be interesting to see how it hooks up.
 

mosebilt

Well-Known Member
Posts
164
Reaction
45
mid engine works great-low polar moment so it changes direction quickly-longer wheelbase with huge rear arms, rear mounted tires help counteract typical mid engine nose dive, the car hooked up great..under seat 90 gallon cell only changed ride height 3/4" between empty/full..

DSCN2096web.JPG
 

Dezertpilot

Well-Known Member
Posts
5,687
Reaction
476
mid engine works great-low polar moment so it changes direction quickly-longer wheelbase with huge rear arms, rear mounted tires help counteract typical mid engine nose dive, the car hooked up great..under seat 90 gallon cell only changed ride height 3/4" between empty/full..

Interesting, why two bypass shocks on the same side?
 

mosebilt

Well-Known Member
Posts
164
Reaction
45
it was a "slapper" shock..trailing arm came up and contacted it...basically a tunable 6" stroke air bump

DSCN2093web.JPG
 

Dezertpilot

Well-Known Member
Posts
5,687
Reaction
476
I would have thought this thread would be on be on fire bu now, when is the last time something radical has happened to class 1 like this? For awhile class 1 seemed stagnant.
 

GEARDOC

Well-Known Member
Posts
228
Reaction
54
I would like to see the exhaust routed farther from the trans. Hopefully they'll put a heat shield under the exhaust pipes by the gear housing.
 

standfast

Well-Known Member
Posts
334
Reaction
113
It will be a very stable ride in the corners, lets see how it does in the rough. Could be a hot ticket on tracks like Parker. I hope to see it there.

The 2 things that they will contend with is toe change which has surely been optimized and the rear kicking over. If the tires are mounted way out back that could help with polar moment and minimize the kick. Shock tuning will be key.

How have the Armada 10 cars that were built with 3-link rears doing? Haven't heard much.
 
Top