Menu
News
Latest News
Desert Racing
Rally Raid
Short Course Racing
Product Reviews
Featured Vehicles
Shop Tours
Story Time
Press Releases
Forum
New posts
Search forums
Classifieds
Video
Calendar
Store
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forum
membership
has its advantages....
Forum
Off-Road Racing Community
Whatever - General Discussion
Race Radio
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TimHayosh" data-source="post: 23831" data-attributes="member: 89"><p><blockquote><font size=1>In reply to:</font><hr></p><p></p><p>The "significant difference" is simply better reception and what appears to be a lot more power when on <strong>our</strong> frequency</p><p></p><p><hr></blockquote></p><p></p><p></p><p>I <em>may</em> be able to shed some actual scientific light on that scenario. While tuning an antenna for a brand new Kenwood 261A with a wattmeter (not SWR), the Kenwood put out about 47 watts (powered through cig socket). This was an unaltered radio on an actual HAM band; a band the radio was built for.</p><p></p><p>When I tuned to a 15X.XXX freq, the output wattage dropped significantly. The antenna was shortened to optimize it's use at this higher freq. The output wattage remained at this lower figure (about 35 watts). I suspect this is due to the radio operating outside of design parameters. Perhaps tweeking the VCO would get this back where we'd like it. I don't have a service manual, so I haven't messed with it. </p><p></p><p>This would explain why the radio performs perfectly in the HAM bands, while possibly putting out less power in the higher business bands. </p><p></p><p>Something to consider.</p><p></p><p>Happy motoring, Tim</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TimHayosh, post: 23831, member: 89"] <blockquote><font size=1>In reply to:</font><hr> The "significant difference" is simply better reception and what appears to be a lot more power when on [b]our[/b] frequency <hr></blockquote> I [i]may[/i] be able to shed some actual scientific light on that scenario. While tuning an antenna for a brand new Kenwood 261A with a wattmeter (not SWR), the Kenwood put out about 47 watts (powered through cig socket). This was an unaltered radio on an actual HAM band; a band the radio was built for. When I tuned to a 15X.XXX freq, the output wattage dropped significantly. The antenna was shortened to optimize it's use at this higher freq. The output wattage remained at this lower figure (about 35 watts). I suspect this is due to the radio operating outside of design parameters. Perhaps tweeking the VCO would get this back where we'd like it. I don't have a service manual, so I haven't messed with it. This would explain why the radio performs perfectly in the HAM bands, while possibly putting out less power in the higher business bands. Something to consider. Happy motoring, Tim [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Off-Road Racing Community
Whatever - General Discussion
Race Radio
.
Top